> Wow, you sunk a lot of time into this. :) Thanks for your kind words. Anything to help Arch be a better Distro.
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Jud <jud at judfilm.net> wrote: > > Hi Devs, > > > > I have been looking at the Arch [core] packages and have noticed > > some issues, could you please take at look and where possible > > rectify them as soon as possible? Thank-you. <Arch Linux> > > > Dan McGee > > dash > > Update Description?: A POSIX-compliant shell that aims to be as > > small as possible without sacrificing speed > > The upstream description from the website is basically what I have now > (http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/dash/), so I'm actually going to > leave it. ok. > > A lot of these suggestions look great, but we don't need to pedantic > here with our exact casing in case people can't figure out the > often-stupid naming schemes of their favorite programs. Another thing > to keep in mind- any description that includes the name of the package > or starts with "<packagename> is..." is too verbose. Keeping > descriptions to one line is also ideal as it keeps -Ss output clean. ok, thanks for the tips. I'll have another look over them.
