On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 12:31 +1000, Jud wrote: > > K. Piche kpiche at rogers.com - Wed Oct 1 00:12:55 EDT 2008 > > On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 17:57 +1000, Jud wrote: > > > boost 1.36.0 (was 1.35) Still needs a patch? > > > http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2008-September/008203.html > > > > The patch is not required for boost to build. It's probably needed > > for apps that use the affected .hpp file. I'll apply and rebuild > > tomorrow. Also I need to build libavg against 1.36.0 before moving to > > extra. > > Just so everyone is on the same page: > > boost 1.36.0 (was 1.35) > Kevin is doing a rebuild today. > http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2008-October/008402.html
Just submitted. > deluge 1.0.0-1 > > gnash-common 0.8.3-4 > Needed in PKGBUILD?: boost>=1.36.0 > > libavg 0.7.0-6 latest-0.8.0 > marked out-of-date I looked briefly at this but libavg now requires some GraphicMagick thing which is in AUR. > miro 1.2.7-2 (was 1.2.7-1) > > python-vpython 3.2.9-4 > Needed in PKGBUILD?: boost>=1.36.0 > > smc 1.5-2 (was 1.5-1) > Update Description?: Secret Maryo Chronicles - a 2-D sidescroller > platform game > > > Do any other boost dependant apps need a rebuild before this moves? There's bmpx but it's not as sensitive to boost version bumps as the others. Also the current version is crap - music players should die when you select a song to play, right? -- K. Piche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
