On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All this should result in support for ALL webcams in ALL v4l(2) > applications. Are there any objections against implementing this or any > additions?
Looks good to me. I trust you on this one, as I don't really do much with webcams at all. I do, however, have some crappy $5 chinese camera, if you need anything tested on a crappy camera that has poor support even on Win32.
