On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jud wrote: >> >> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:35:25 +0200 >> Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Jan de Groot schrieb: >>> >>>> >>>> I would like to know the status of bluez in testing at this moment. >>>> GNOME 2.24.0 depends on the testing bluez-libs at this moment, I >>>> would like to move both at the same time. >>>> >>>> I lost track of this project, as they're not my packages. Any >>>> rebuilds pending? Any patches we need to apply? >>>> >>> >>> bluez needs an update, which I have no time for. Many applications >>> need to be patched to use the new bluez API, which I have no time >>> for. I'd like to orphan bluez completely and let someone else take >>> care of it, as I can't keep up with it. Anyone interested? >>> >>> >> >> Hi all, >> >> In the interest of getting this moving and improving Arch, I will >> gladly help someone to get Bluez moved into [core]. I have attempted to >> update the necessary packages (attached). Also, I noticed voidnull >> (Giovanni Scafora) has two bluez related packages in [community] and >> might be a good person to ask questions to. >> >> bluez.PKGBUILD >> bluez-firmware.PKGBUILD >> bluez-gnome.PKGBUILD >> bluez-hcidump.PKGBUILD >> >> ## Notes: >> Thomas has limited time, some rebuilds will be necessary - >> http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2008-September/008251.html >> Red Hat should have patches if needed - >> http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2008-September/008252.html >> >> >> # List of rebuilds needed?: >> gnokii (testing) >> gvfs (testing) >> libbtctl (testing) >> obex-data-server (testing) >> openobex (testing) >> qemu (testing) >> -- >> bluez-gnome-1.8 [extra] roman? >> bluez-firmware-1.2 [community] voidnull >> bluez-hcidump-1.42 [community] voidnull >> obexd-0.5 AUR >> -- >> Needed? >> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/bluetooth/libgdbus-0.2.tar.bz2 >> >> >> # Redundant: >> bluez-libs >> bluez-utils >> > > Is anyone going to attempt this rebuild? This is holding up gnome which is > holding up python which means I can't slack of at work doing rebuilds... I > will do these if necessary but I have no way of testing any of these > packages so it would be better if someone else did this.
I would say just do it. I don't think any of us regularly use bluetooth.
