On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/10/21 Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 12:10 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: >>> Hmmm... personally, it seems more like it belongs in extra, >>> conceptually, but it is a kernel module which also seems to point to >>> core. I'm neutral on it, so I say we do a little informal vote on >>> this. >>> >>> Should fuse stay in core? Y/N >> >> I'll leave it up to the maintainer. Advantage of having fuse in extra is >> that future versions don't require signoffs ;) >> >> Signoff for both architectures anyways. > > +1 for extra > signoff for x86_64. > > -- > Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич) >
okay, extra it is -> moved Ronald
