On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 20:06 -0500, Dan McGee wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Dusty Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > I've finished my first iteration of porting the archweb_pub and > > archweb_dev sites to django-1.0, along with a substantial rewrite of > > several portions of the code, as I mentioned in a previous status > > update. I'm confident the porting part has gone smoothly, but I have > > concerns that I overlooked testing all aspects (as there are no unit > > tests on this project as yet) of the code I rewrote. > > > > As such I'm soliciting developer and community to test both sites. The > > more people that break it, the better I'll feel about putting it into > > production. ;-) I've copied the current archweb database into a > > playground for testing. The two sites can be accessed here: > > > > Public Arch Linux site: > > http://pub.playground.archlinux.ca/ > > > > Developer Arch Linux site: > > http://dev.playground.archlinux.ca/ > > > > Since I copied the live database over, your developer login on the > > test site should be the same as it is on the live archweb_dev. > > > > Once I'm confident the site is tested enough, I will need someone with > > superpowers to schedule a time to coordinate the upgrade of django > > (via pacman, drop the ignorepkg in pacman.conf) with merging the new > > branch into master and updating the live site. We should probably take > > the live site down for a bit -- do you think we can pull Eliott out of > > retirement for a bit to come up with a downtime message? > > I just did a quick browse of the public site and things seemed to be > working fine, or at least I didn't break it. Great work here, thanks.
Looks pretty good to me too. I'm just curious if Judd still wants his mailto link at the bottom of every page. :) > -Dan -- K. Piche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
