On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Tonight I noticed the presence of sha1sums in a couple of PKGBUILDs I >> adopted. Are we adopting a new policy toward sha1sums? Did I miss >> the memo? > > Which packages? I think it's technically fine as long as the md5sums > are still there. If it's just sha1sums then I think the previous > maintainer may have been feeling frisky
They did contain both types of hashes...I believe it was streamripper and numlockx. So it was just a case of someone thinking of future validation methods?
