On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > urgh. I wonder why especially you raise that question. > > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Patching > > It's an essential core package where "eyecandy" patching is a strict > NOGO to me. I see not one reason why it should be acceptable to break > our rules here.
It's important to point out that I did NOT raise the question because I have a preference. I made it a point to say "this goes against our rules". I brought it up because: a) A handful of people have asked me about this recently b) I've used it for years with no issues c) The install iso uses it d) I just wanted to see what others thought Really. It's not a big deal. No hard feelings, ok?
