On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Aaron Griffin <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Thomas Bächler <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Daniel Isenmann schrieb: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> there were a discussion on the arch-general list about why not adding > >> moonlight to the repo > >> > >> ( > http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2009-January/003326.html). > >> > >> Now I want to discuss this topic further from a developer point of view. > > > > First thought: I don't care. I have never come across anything that needs > > Silverlight/Moonlight. > > > > Second thought: If I ever come across a site that needs it, I'd be happy > if > > it would be available with pacman -S moonlight. > > > > Third thought: I still don't care, and I won't until I come across the > > situation in my second thought. > > > > So if you want to maintain it, do it. If not, then don't. > > This is my sentiment too. I've never needed Silver/Moon-light for > anything. I even used to use it for work at my last job, but I never > needed to visit those sites in Linux. That said: the recent US > Inauguration was broadcast with Silverlight, so it is seeing some use. > > I will echo Thomas' point: I don't care, but if I need to care at some > point, pacman -S moonlight would be great. > > +1 for inclusion as long as you have the desire to maintain it. > I add ny +1 to this group.
