On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Andreas Radke <[email protected]> wrote: > I have made a change to the patch package that "ed" is now an optional > dependency. I've searched through our svn and all I've found is that no > other package depends on ed. I think "ed" is still a widely used *nix > editor and you would expect it to be there. >
Just out of curiosity, does anyone here actually use ed? I never used it, not even once :) Anyway, it's a 100kb package with no deps, and according to you, well maintained upstream, so I don't think it's much important where it sits.
