On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Aaron Griffin <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Am Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2009 20:20:01 schrieb Aaron Griffin: >>>> Additionally, please check >>>> ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/sources/failed.txt >>> >>> Are you sure about this list? I have checked some of my packages listed >>> there >>> and except of openssl all work. >> >> Well, the error output is a LITTLE bit goofy - it includes failures >> for licenses, I think. >> >> Right now, we only maintain sources for packages with licenses in >> LGPL, LGPL2, GPL, GPL2. If the package doesn't have one of those, it's >> reported as a failure. I've pushed a fix for this so that license >> errors are still output, but the run is counted as success. >> > > Well, for now, at least the packages in /var/log/sourceballs should be > fixed (in some cases they're just out-of-date). These are the real > failiures. The rest is missing/invalid license and licenses for which > we don't create sourceballs. And I would like to know who's willing > to help out fixing packages with missing licenses to make sure there's > no duplication of work. That's the 2 important things to do at > present. > > BTW, I noticed that errors.txt doesn't print the name of the package > which generated the error. So it's practically useless for now. Once > that'll be fixed, we'll know which packages have a missing/invalid > license.
Yeah it's fixed n git already
