On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Andreas Radke <[email protected]> wrote: >> Am Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:06:15 -0400 >> schrieb Eric Bélanger <[email protected]>: >> >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Andreas Radke <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Am Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:19:57 -0500 >>> > schrieb Eric Bélanger <[email protected]>: >>> > >>> > >>> >> If they don't update often and if no other dev/TU is willing to >>> >> adopt it, I could just update it for this time being. Lately, >>> >> I've been busy updating orphaned packages so a couple more won't >>> >> matter ;). In fact, I was about to post a status report on the >>> >> remaining ones. I will do that sometime soon. >>> >> >>> > >>> > gnash-common and -gtk have been added to AUR. please decide to >>> > update the official packages/remove AUR ones or leave them up to >>> > the community. >>> > >>> > your choice. >>> > >>> > -Andy >>> > >>> >>> I've started to work on an gnash upgrade. But keep the gnash PKGBUILD >>> in unsupported until the update is actually done. (ie I might change >>> my mind). >>> >>> BTW, I'll probably use agg for the renderer instead of opengl for >>> performance reason: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13443. This was >>> done in the PKGBUILD in AUR. I might also change the media from >>> gstreamer to ffmpeg. I've read somewhere that ffmpeg was better on >>> Youtube. Currently, gnash 0.8.4 or 0.8.5 doesn't work on Youtube as >>> far as I could tell. >>> >> >> Please take care of the AGG license. I remember we dropped its usage >> in OOo and switched back to an older agg version shipped with the OOo >> sources. >> >> see http://www.antigrain.com/license/index.html >> >> -Andy >> > > AGG 2.5 is licensed under the GPL (same for gnash) so that shouldn't > be a problem. > > Eric >
FYI, I've just put gnash 0.8.5 in extra. It now use agg and ffmpeg.
