On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Ronald van Haren <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/6/09, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Ronald van Haren <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Ronald van Haren <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Ronald van Haren <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> In testing for both architectures. Please signoff. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ronald >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bumped to 1.4.3.1-1, so please signoff that one. >>>>> >>>>> Upstream changes wrt 1.4.3: >>>>> iptables-save: minor corrections to the manpage markup >>>>> libxt_hashlimit: add missing space for iptables-save output >>>>> iptables: refer to dmesg if we hit EINVAL >>>>> libxtables: fix compile error due to incomplete change >>>>> build: fix linker issue when LDFLAGS contains --as-needed >>>>> >>>>> Ronald >>>>> >>>> >>>> signoff x86_64 >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>> >>> I know we were going to phase the 32 bit architecture out, but I'd >>> still like to move it to core sometime in the near future :) >>> Anyone who can signoff for i686? >>> >>> Ronald >>> >> >> FYI, 1.4.3.2 is out. >> > > I'd like to move 1.4.3.1 tomorrow into core so I can get to 1.4.3.2. > Please someone signoff for i686, or can I have an auto signoff Aaron? > > Ronald >
I would say go ahead and move it to core. It has been in testing for nearly 2 weeks; if there's no bug report, it's fine. I checked it and it seems OK. Signoff i686. Eric
