On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Aaron Griffin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Aaron Griffin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Aaron Griffin wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> How hard would it be to convert from using unionfs to aufs2 in devtools? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Very easy. Minor changes to the mount syntax. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Great. Any chance of a patch now the kernel without unionfs is in [core]? >>>> I don't have time to look into this at the moment but would like to >>>> continue using the build tools... >>> >>> Yeah, I will get to this tonight. I have been slacking way too much >>> with Arch stuff (been hella busy at work) - it irritates me, so I'm >>> going to power through a few things I've been putting off tonight. >>> >>> Both devtools AND archiso need changes, but I also want to get some of >>> my packages out of the way and finish up the bash rebuilds (mkinitcpio >>> issue is fixed in one of the official patches, so I'll be pushing out >>> 4.0.17 as soon as I can) >>> >> >> Any update for devtools? I'm still using 2.6.29.1-2 as I want to keep >> using my chroots. > > If you want to jump ahead: > http://code.phraktured.net/cgit.cgi/devtools/commit/?id=ca87391f99760dc6677df419031108e65b588ecd > > The patch is simple, as aufs supports unionfs syntax too. Actually a > sed "s/unionfs/aufs/" should actually work too. > > Make sure to install aufs2-util though
Any qualms with me releasing devtools as it is from git?
