On Wednesday 22 April 2009 11:22:01 am Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Hugo Doria <[email protected]> wrote: > > Anyone else? I really want to end this. > > > > -- Hugo > > My opinion is the same as it was in that bug. I think our mplayer > packages should only be mplayer, not gmplayer. That doesn't > necessarily mean someone needs to package gmplayer, but I'm sure > someone would. > > My vote - kill off the gui version in our package I completely agree with this. So please, go this way.
- [arch-dev-public] Mplayer in two separate packages Hugo Doria
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplayer in two separate package... Thomas Bächler
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplayer in two separate pac... Hugo Doria
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplayer in two separate... Pierre Schmitz
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplayer in two sepa... Andrea Scarpino
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplayer in two... Eric Bélanger
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplayer in... Eduardo Romero
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplayer in two separate package... Allan McRae
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplayer in two separate pac... Hugo Doria
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplayer in two separate... Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplayer in two sepa... Eduardo Romero
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplayer in two sepa... Daenyth Blank
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplayer in two... Aaron Griffin
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplayer in... Hugo Doria
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplaye... Eric Bélanger
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplaye... Hugo Doria
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplaye... Pierre Schmitz
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplaye... Hugo Doria
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplaye... Eduardo Romero
- Re: [arch-dev-public] Mplaye... Hugo Doria
