On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Tobias Powalowski <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Donnerstag 14 Mai 2009 schrieb Aaron Griffin: >> Because I haven't gotten to it sooner: Eric, you're awesome for doing >> this. I send you many eHugs >> >> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> > wrote: >> > Just bumping to get more input. And doing an update/summary at the same >> > time. >> > >> > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> The license rebuild for core/extra is almost done. Only a few >> >> problematic packages remains. I'll post the list here with potential >> >> solutions. Read along and comment/discuss as apropriate. >> >> >> >> codecs: >> >> emovix-codecs: >> >> - There is no license information in the tarball or on mplayer's site. >> >> Other distros use the following licenses: >> > >> > Do we keep them? Remove them? More input would be required to get a >> > concenssus. >> >> Let's remove it. It's not a dep of anything anyway.
It's currently a (optional?) dep of a community pkg. See the first post. >> >> >> dgen-sdl: >> >> FS#12564 and license issue. x86_64 package will probably be removed >> >> because of this. I guess I could go ahead and add the license to the >> >> i686 package. >> > >> > James contacted the code author and got permission to patch it. So the >> > x86_64 package will be fixed and the license will be added. >> >> Can we make sure we include the permission blurb in the package license >> info? that has been mentionned in the bug report. >> >> >> mkpxelinux: >> >> - Tobias P. custom script. License is unspecified. Tobias: can you >> >> give it a license? >> > >> > Still needs to be done. >> >> Pinging tpowa - please license this code. > Uh yeah sorry, as all mkxyz... programs GPL Are you going to rebuild it? Otherwise I could do it. > > greetings > tpowa > > -- > Tobias Powalowski > Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) > http://www.archlinux.org > [email protected] >
