Am Mittwoch 17 Juni 2009 schrieb Dan McGee: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Tobias Powalowski<[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Based on nfs-utils from AUR we could support nfs4 rather easily. > > > > Major changes: > > - daemon scripts changed, nfslock and nfsd are dropped > > - nfs-common and nfs-server are introduced, both have their config files > > on /etc/conf.d > > nfs-common is intended to run on nfs clients + server > > nfs-server is intended to run on nfs server > > - NFS4 is implemented > > > > please try and give feedback to make this one bullet proof > > thanks > > This stuff should definitely get in a news item when it rolls out. It > is rather extensive changes as my existing NFS setup would have > completely busted without doing s/nfsd/nfs-server/, > s/portmap/rpcbind/, killing nfslock, etc. It should also be very > apparent what exact changes need to be made (I think I covered most of > them there). > > For now, I am *not* signing off until we get an install message that > doesn't tell me a bunch of unnecessary stuff (how to set up NFSv4) and > does say "this is a rather big upgrade, you are going to have to > change things", and nothing more. And please set up the message to > only show once so I don't see this on the next nfs-utils version bump > (vercmp is your friend). > > Thanks for doing this upgrade, it looks like this set of tools is a > bit more self-contained, robust, and supports nfs 3 and 4 quite well. > > -Dan Done, please signoff 1.2.0-2 package. greetings tpowa
-- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
