On Wednesday 08 July 2009 05:18:50 K. Piche wrote: > That was me. I've tested a good number of the packages and most don't > require a rebuild which is odd since in the past it was always a hassle. > smc only required a rebuild cause the boost versioned dep had a '=' and > not '>='. I'll finish this up.
Just remove those packages from the list that don't need a rebuild. > Also I think we should drop bmpx if no one has objections. Doesn't work > well and hasn't been updated in more than a year. Sure, why not. This would also include bmp-musepack and bmp-wma which was not rebuild since 2005. -- Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
