On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Eric Bélanger<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Eric Bélanger<[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Gerardo Exequiel > >> Pozzi<[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Eric Bélanger wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Pierre Schmitz<[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Wednesday 01 July 2009 14:12:05 Allan McRae wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Devs, please remember to mark off rebuilt packages from the TODO list > >>>>>> as > >>>>>> you go. > >>>>>> > >>>>> sane-frontends and netpbm do not compile. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I just commited a patch for netpbm to fix some of the compile > >>>> problems. It still needs more patching to compile. The remaining error > >>>> is: > >>>> > >>>> jpeg.c: In function `ReadJPEG': > >>>> jpeg.c:473: error: `struct jpeg_decompress_struct' has no member named > >>>> `min_DCT_scaled_size' > >>>> > >>>> This is because min_DCT_scaled_size is no longer defined in libjpeg's > >>>> header files. I don't know how to fix it. I wasn't able to find any > >>>> patches. It seems that the libjpeg update is too new. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Reading the libjpeg.h seems that replacing with min_DCT_v_scaled_size is > >>> fine. Quote from header: "Therefore, the IDCT output contains > >>> v_samp_factor*DCT_v_scaled_size sample rows of a component per iMCU row." > >>> > >>> buffer_height = cinfo.max_v_samp_factor * cinfo.min_DCT_v_scaled_size; > >>> > >>> But maybe I wrong. > >>> > >>> > >>> BTW: should be compiled with -fno-strict-aliasing there are some > >>> warnings about this, and the code can or not work correctly. > >>> > >> > >> I'll check it out. The pkgrel for netpbm is misused. It'll need to be > >> fixed. If someone as a better/verified patch, post it here. I'll take > >> care of the rebuild and pkgrel fixing. > > > > A rebuilt netpbm with this fix will be in testing soon. I'll > > check/rebuild the sane packages. > > > > FYI, the rebuild is completed. :) I guess what's left to do is to > keep these in testing for at least a couple of days to make sure > everything works fine and there was no omissions.
Thanks for the hard work on this, guys. It's been surprisingly seemless so far. :) -Dan
