Dan McGee wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Thomas Bächler<[email protected]> wrote:
Arch Website Notification schrieb:
   Package Name: openvpn
   Architecture: x86_64
   Repository:   Testing
   (http://www.archlinux.org/packages/testing/x86_64/openvpn/)


The user provided the following additional text:

Hi,
I know the official stable version of openvpn is 2.0.9, but this version
is 3 years old and outdated! Normally there is nothing wrong with 3 years
old software, but this version doesn&#39;t work with the most of the
openvpn-servers I have to connect!
Most of the servers require version &gt;=2.1_RC7. And even Debain-stable
ships openvpn 2.1_RC7!
Best regards
Armin
What do you think? Here's the advantages of 2.1:

- More features
- I use 2.1 exclusively, so if we switch to 2.1, someone would actively
maintain and test openvpn (me)
- The "release candidates" are as stable as you would expect a final
release, they always work great.

Should we switch to openvpn 2.1?

Seems silly to me to stick with old software, esp if Debian stable is
outpacing us...

Agreed. I just put 2.1_rc18 in testing for both arches. It works here for me to connect to a vpn, so I put it out there for feedback from others.

I'll plan to move it in a week if there are no outstanding issues.

- P

Reply via email to