On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:26, Gerhard Brauer<[email protected]> wrote: > Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 01:31 +0300 schrieb Roman Kyrylych: >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 23:22, Gerhard Brauer<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Generally you're right, but this package contains only this commit: >> > http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commit;h=92cbc62e1c1b22c6cc251628e8d51a45607998b6 >> >> I hope this commit was added too: >> http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=initscripts.git;a=commitdiff;h=28d34292a9a8a03ea78a909ccb1d8d50ee21d0bb >> ;-) > > That is a little confusing ;-) I never committed to initscripts, i sent > a patch in FS#15263. I think Aaron wrote the commit and had a typo. > In the modified initscripts 2009.03-2 we use my patch from the flyspray > report. > >> I don't get it - the change exists in the core package anyway. >> What am I missing? > > No, it's not in core (initscripts 2009.03-2).
Ah, I confused 2009.07 with 2009.03, Yeah, initscripts should move to core. I don't remember if I gave signoffs for the latest versions, but mkinitcpio, cryptsetup and initscripts are working fine here on x86_64. So here are my signoffs for them. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
