On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Andreas Radke<[email protected]> wrote: > urgh. after changing stuff on my local mirror i had pointed in > pacman.conf to the x86_64 mirror :S > > fixed now. anyways, a pacman.static could save a lot of time in such > cases.
2 things here: 1. pacman.static is in the pacman package, so it wouldn't have helped much, no? 2. You were missing vercmp (or the wrong arch), so that didn't work anyway If someone wants to readd a pacman.static to the pacman package, I welcome a patch *to the PKGBUILD*, but it doesn't belong in the pacman code base. And I'm still not convinced it can get you out of a lot of situations, e.g. a missing glibc still screws you. -Dan
