On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Jan de Groot<[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 14:33 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Pierre Schmitz<[email protected]> wrote: >> > Am Montag 10 August 2009 21:04:10 schrieb Tobias Powalowski: >> >> Due to the slicehost issue, shall we wait until they react on this? >> >> I'm don't like to depend on others for our package upgrades. >> >> Any other opinions? >> > >> > We cannot wait for every single provider to catch up; so why do this with >> > this >> > one here? We don't support keeping old versions of packages while updating >> > all >> > others; and that's what we have here in the end. >> >> I agree with Pierre here. Even though I do have a slice, management of >> that slice is _my_ job. I've already attempted (and failed) the >> upgrade, so am aware of the problem. Adding udev to IgnorePkg isn't >> too hard, and that's kinda what it's made for > > The new udev will be a dependency for things like devicekit-power and > devicekit-disks, but since those are things for the desktop stack, I > don't see reason to have it on a slicehost server. > > BTW: Did anyone actually try to run this version of udev on an older > kernel?
Yeah, I tried it on my slice and it failed miserably. Posted this in another thread about this: (signalfd man page has sample code) agrif...@snarf:~$ man signalfd agrif...@snarf:~$ vim signalfd_demo.c agrif...@snarf:~$ gcc signalfd_demo.c -o signalfd_demo agrif...@snarf:~$ ./signalfd_demo signalfd: Function not implemented agrif...@snarf:~$ uname -a Linux snarf 2.6.24-24-xen #1 SMP Tue Jun 30 21:53:02 UTC 2009 x86_64 Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2212 HE AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
