On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: > In the spirit of Eli making a bunch of patches for the AUR, I finally decided > to sit down tonight and figure out why the heck namcap was sucking it up, and > did a little code cleanup along the way. namcap.py is now a bit cleaner and > separated into functions, and the real treat is namcap is a hell of a lot > faster now that I found the bottleneck, which was the depends hook. The first > 6 > patches in this series lead up to the 7th, which is where the speed increase > is > found. > > Let me know what you see, otherwise it would be cool to get this in and a new > namcap release made, as it has rather dramatic effects with regards to speed. > > If you don't like patches, you can get all this from my git tree as well: > http://code.toofishes.net/cgit/dan/namcap.git/log/?h=working > > -Dan > > Dan McGee (7): > Rename 'tags' to 'namcap-tags' > Only process tags if necessary > Move extracted variable to the correct scope > Only do active_modules check once > Move PKGBUILD processing to a function > Move real package processing to a function > Make the depends module not suck > > Namcap/depends.py | 104 +++++++++++++++++++------------- > README | 10 ++-- > namcap-tags | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++ > namcap.py | 173 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- > setup.py | 2 +- > tags | 65 -------------------- > tests/tags-check | 4 +- > 7 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 199 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 namcap-tags > delete mode 100644 tags
Pinging the namcap maintainer? -Dan
