Jan de Groot a écrit : > On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 10:08 +0200, Firmicus wrote: > >> Jan de Groot wrote: >> >>> Somehow the texlive-bin PKGBUILD doesn't provide the same binary package >>> that is in the repository. I just committed a gnome-unstable directory >>> with 3 patches that fixes build against poppler 0.12, but building it >>> with makechrootpkg results in a lot of missing binaries. Also, I >>> couldn't build texlive-bin without adding some force commands to ln and >>> rm. >>> >> Thanks for reporting this Jan. I'll happily loot into this. But can you >> send me some more details first? >> >> Here are the facts from my side: >> >> texlive-bin 2009.4-2 was indeed created with "makepkg -R" on the basis >> of the previous build (pkgrel=1) because I only needed to add two >> missing symlinks for texlua and texluac (see FS#16486) and did not feel >> like rebuilding the whole goddam thing for something as simple as that >> (ca. 30 minutes of compilation at full processor last costs a lot of >> electricity you know ;) and my fans get real noisy too!)... >> >> So yes, I did fix that by hand: I unpacked the previously built packages >> under $pkgdir, created the symlinks, added the corresponding missing >> lines in the PKGBUILD, and then repackaged. I can assure you that the >> previous build (2009.4-1) was generated from the PKGBUILD then in trunk. >> But it was NOT built with makechrootpkg. Sometimes (rarely) makechroot >> is not a good idea. I know that building subversion and gvim with >> makechroot can yield incorrect packages. In the particular case of >> texlive-bin, which is very complex, I need to be in full control and a >> chroot environment does not provide this condition. But I am open to >> your criticism if you think this is not a good approach ;) >> >> Yet I am nevertheless surprised that texlive-bin does not build well >> with makechrootpkg. I certainly does in a normal environment. >> > > The fixes were minor. It took me several rebuilds to find this out, but > here's a list: > - The symlinks you created weren't in the PKGBUILD correctly, I added > the correct ones, but didn't remove the wrong ones > why?
> - The command that generates all the symlinks depends on texlive-bin > being installed on the system, I fixed it by adding $pkgdir/usr/bin to > $PATH > Besides the two fixes, nothing special was done to the package. > OK, I have just examined your fixes with svn diff: thanks a lot! F
