On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 15:45 -0400, Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > The binutils-2.20 toolchain rebuild is in [testing] for i686. I will do > > the x86_64 rebuilds in the next day or two. A summary of changes: > > > > kernel-headers - bump to latest > > > > binutils - bump to latest > > > > glibc - grab upstream patchset for proposed future stable release, fix > > overflow bug (FS#16253), patch to build against latest binutils > > > > gcc - bump to latest, use package spitting (gcc-libs, gcc, gcc-fortran, > > gcc-objc), move static libraries from gcc-libs to gcc, add gcc-ada > > package, do not run fixincludes during build. > > > > I will call for a signoff a few days after getting the x86_64 builds done. > > > > Allan > > > > FYI, kernel-headers would be a candidate for the any arch. However, if > you do the switch, then you'll need to release the toolchain for both > arches at the same time otherwise it might break some stuff.
I wouldn't be too sure about that. Have you diffed extracted tarballs of kernel-headers for both architectures and did it return only .PKGINFO related differences? Reason for asking this is the /usr/include/asm directory. Though these files are just stupid header files, the asm directory is usually taken from architecture-specific includes.
