On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Andreas Radke <[email protected]> wrote: > I get this weird permission issue in go-oo build makepkg: > > Packaging succeeded > /tmp/go-openoffice/trunk/src/ooo-build-3.2.0.1/build/ooo320-m8/dictionaries/unxlngx6.pro/bin > /tmp/go-openoffice/trunk/src/ooo-build-3.2.0.1 > /tmp/go-openoffice/trunk/src/ooo-build-3.2.0.1 > /tmp/go-openoffice/trunk/src/ooo-build-3.2.0.1/build/ooo320-m8/solver/320/unxlngx6.pro/bin > /tmp/go-openoffice/trunk/src/ooo-build-3.2.0.1 > /tmp/go-openoffice/trunk/src/ooo-build-3.2.0.1 > ==> Tidying install... > -> Purging other files... > -> Compressing man and info pages... > -> Stripping debugging symbols from binaries and libraries... > /usr/bin/strip: unable to copy file > 'usr/lib/go-openoffice/ure/lib/libuno_sal_textenc.so.3'; reason: > Permission denied > > real 89m57.478s > user 215m13.768s > sys 22m56.040s > > It's reproducible. File permissions are the same like in the last go-oo > release that built fine. It happens in my testing chroot. > > pkg working on my laptop that built fine: > > [andy...@laptop64 tmp]$ ls -lha > /usr/lib/go-openoffice/ure/lib/libuno_sal_textenc.so.3 > -r--r--r-- 1 root root 1,8M 28. Nov 14:43 > /usr/lib/go-openoffice/ure/lib/libuno_sal_textenc.so.3 > > in my chroot right after the build failure: > -r--r--r-- 1 andyrtr users 2.0M Dec 28 12:47 > pkg/usr/lib/go-openoffice/ure/lib/libuno_sal_textenc.so.3 > > The pkg is not a splitted pkgbuild! Just plain oldschool build{} > > Any idea? May this be smp related?
Hmm, I've had problems on other Unicies like this (with strip), but that was typically caused when using GNU's strip against binaries created by other crazy compilers. Is this .so created by gcc?
