Am Montag 18 Januar 2010 schrieb Andreas Radke: > Greg KH just posted on the LKML this news: > > Here's the state of the -stable kernel trees, as of January 18, 2010. > > 2.6.27-stable > ... > I'll probably keep maintaining it for at least 6-8 more months, but > after that, I can not guarantee it's viability. Note, one other > developer has volunteered to pick up the tree after I am finished with > it, but I can not speak for him at this time. > ... > 2.6.32-stable > > I'd like to announce that the 2.6.32-stable tree is also going to be > maintained as a "long-term" stable release, living for 2-3 years, like > the 2.6.27 kernel is. This is because a number (i.e. more than 2) Linux > distributions are basing their "enterprise" releases on this kernel > version, and it will make their lives easier if I keep it alive. > ... > > > > I suggest to move our LTS kernel to .32 series not before our kernel26 > has moved to .33 series. Better a bit later than to fast. > > -Andy > I would like to move it sooner than later, early userspace needs more recent kernel without having hacks and workarounds.
greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
