Am 06.02.2010 15:14, schrieb Paul Mattal: > All, > > There's been some compelling arguments made in the below bug request to > switch from syslog-ng to rsyslog: > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12314 > > I'm planning to start the process of migrating to rsyslog in March, if a > rough show of hands here confirms it's the right thing to do. > > Can people give a quick +1 or -1 to this idea? > > - P >
+/-0 if we keep maintaining syslog-ng in extra and don't actually "replace" it (as in pacman-replace).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
