On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Aaron Griffin <[email protected]> wrote: > I have no problem with removing it, especially considering we've always been > fine with makedepends in other repos. >
Another solution would be to use a whitelist so that the packages with out-of-repo makedepends that we are aware of, and agree upon, won't be listed in the report. > PS sent from my phone, sorry if the format blows. I think it's top > posting... > > On Feb 19, 2010 7:14 PM, "Xavier Chantry" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:00 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends... > Do we want to clutter the output of integrity check every week with > makedepends repo hierarchy, which seems to get very little interest > and attention (for good reasons) ? > > It's a growing list, and it's the most useless section but takes more > than half of the total report length. > > PS : aaron in CC because I think I cannot post to arch-dev-public with > that mail :) >
