Re: [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 4/7] Remove testing2* scripts

[Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)]

On 03/11/10 at 04:33pm, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
> <ghost1...@archlinux.us> wrote:
> > On 03/11/10 at 04:26pm, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
> >> <ghost1...@archlinux.us> wrote:
> >> > On 03/11/10 at 04:06pm, Dan McGee wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Ghost1227 <ghost1...@archlinux.us> 
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > ---
> >> >>
> >> >> Why do none of your patches have commit messages outside of the
> >> >> subject? Why are these getting removed? What is the new command? How,
> >> >> 6 months from now, am I going to make sense of this commit?
> >> >>
> >> >> Sorry for sounding like I'm coming down with a hammer on your patches
> >> >> here, but I think this things are truly important.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Dan
> >> > Not a problem, the commit messages (with the exception of the first)
> >> > are taken directly from the commit messages on Aaron's dbscripts branch.
> >> > The testing2* scripts are being removed because the db-move script
> >> > can now handle multiple packages in any repo natively.
> >>
> >> No they're not. My branch has text there:
> >> http://code.phraktured.net/cgit.cgi/dbscripts/log/?h=working
> >>
> >> See
> >> http://code.phraktured.net/cgit.cgi/dbscripts/commit/?h=working&id=d2a61d7e695b8c956897c42464f39dbbdb39fb5e
> > Oops... sorry about that. Looks like I missed a few notes.
> 
> If you added my git repo as a remote and cherry-picked them in, not
> only would the full commit messages be preserved, but authorship info
> too
Learning experience! Still working on learning how much git can do...
--