On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 16:01, Aaron Griffin <[email protected]> wrote: > In which case the behavior is normal and expected, yes? I mean, if I > understand the new grub2 correctly, there should be no config, but the > mkconfig command needs to be run. >
I think the issue was that the maintainer didn't realize removing it from backup would remove it from user systems. I don't have the thread at hand right now.
