On 04/07/10 at 11:06am, Allan McRae wrote: > On 07/04/10 10:21, Philipp wrote: > >Excerpts from fons's message of 2010-04-07 00:46:09 +0200: > >>It seems like Arch is currently offering Jack and qjackctl > >>packages that are not compatible. > >> > >>The Jack authors changed one some command line options > >>in 0.118. '-R' for realtime is no longer available as > >>realtime is now the default, and the new '-r' means > >>'no realtime'. > >> > >>Qjackctl 0.3.6 is aware of this, but won't work well with > >>Jack 0.116 which is still the one available from Arch. > >>In other words, the update of qjackctl was probably a bit > >>premature. > >> > >>Ciao, > > > >The real problem is that jack is still stuck at the rather old 0.116. > >One reason might be those, IMHO in the meanwhile annoying scripts that > >ship with the Arch jack package. It's tough to get them right it seems. > >I would be all in favor of splitting them into a separate package and > >install jack just the way it is supposed to. Much less hassle, less > >confused users and as a bonus those scripts can be easily used with > >other variants of jack. > > > >Either way, there's really no reason to still ship 0.116.2 when 0.118.0 > >was released in November, almost 5 months ago. > > > jack 0.118 is in [testing]. Does anyone know the reason why it is > there and whether it can be moved? > > Allan > Should be movable. Should have moved a while ago... --
Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] jack & qjackctl
Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:26:19 -0700
- Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] jack &... Allan McRae
- Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] j... Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)

