On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16/04/10 23:21, Dan McGee wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Allan McRae<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> gcc-4.5.0-1: >>> upstream update >>> add new deps (libmpc, libelf) >>> enable link time optimization >>> tidy up configure >>> add c89 and c99 launcher scripts (POSIX compatibility) >> >> Will we at some point want to add the -lto flag (or whatever it is) to >> both CFLAGS and LDFLAGS in our defaults? > > It is -flto (and if you are really keen, add -fwhopr with -fwhole-program > - experimental). > > I would not advocate adding it by default. Linking is a lot slower > (obviously) and it seems to use more memory... sometimes a lot more. OK sounds good.
> I'd > let the ricers play with this flag for a while before considering it as the > default. But they get to have all the fun! :P http://www.pbase.com/ha3349/image/76708585 -Dan
