Am 12.10.2010 22:06, schrieb Dan McGee: > Honestly, can this decision to split the package be explained a bit > more? I feel like we've gone a little overboard on doing some of these > splits. Saving 405K from a package (installed, while only 80K on the > download!) seems silly for the number of "where did my glx* tools go" > and "I installed mesa but don't have glx*" questions that are going to > arise now, especially from long-time Arch users.
It was in a separate package for some time in the past, then merged into mesa again. I agree with Dan here.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
