On 4 May 2011 14:29, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/05/11 15:22, Rémy Oudompheng wrote: >> >> On Wed 04 May 2011 at 14:13 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: >>> >>> Now seems a good time to take a quick look at the packages in >>> [testing] and see what we can clear out. It looks like we have >>> libgl, haskell and texlive rebuilds sitting there at the moment as >>> well as the usual packages awaiting signoffs. There are also a few >>> packages that I am not too sure why they are in [testing] at the >>> moment. >> >> I moved texlive. I can check later if haskell is not broken (Vesa must >> have taken care of this one) and I think opencv should be moved quickly, >> as it has patched headers to be usable with g++ 4.6. >> > > Ah... I remember the opencv rebuild for gcc-4.6. I have moved it.
Thanks. I was actually waiting for this: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23826 But it was about time..closed. -- GPG/PGP ID: 8AADBB10
