On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:09:10AM -0500, Dan McGee wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Dave Reisner <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:07:16PM +0300, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Evangelos Foutras > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Dave Reisner <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> >> I've pushed the final release of the pacman 3 series into [testing]. > >> >> This is a maintenance release with the following changes: > >> >> > >> >> - fix display of lists on non-TTYs and other output fixes > >> >> - fix group selection entry for large inputs (FS#24253) > >> >> - fix divide by zero when downloading zero length files > >> >> - flush terminal input before reading response (FS#20538) > >> >> - allow files to be replaced by directories (FS#24904) > >> >> - makepkg: fix filenames with spaces and noextract (FS#25100) > >> >> - scripts: remove ln -f option for POSIX compliance (FS24893) > >> >> - various small documentation updates > >> >> - minor translation updates: de, fi > >> >> > >> >> Please signoff both architectures. > >> > > >> > Signoff x86_64. > >> > >> I take that back. > >> > >> http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/commit/?id=e92905a2 should be > >> merged into the maint branch and included in a new release, otherwise > >> running makepkg a second time will fail. > > > > Damn, I knew there was something broken in > > > > http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/commit/?id=c36dbf97118d8 > > > > Agree, this should be merged. > > Told you the word "final" would burn you. :) > > Anyway, I'll cherry-pick it onto maint but I'm not pushing a whole new > release for this one non-fatal issue. I'd grab the git patch [1] I'm > about to push and treat pacman as any other package that needs an > upstream patch. > > -Dan > > [1] commit c493eef643ecb3a54c79083c51a8975f816ed9de > Author: Allan McRae <[email protected]> > Date: Tue Jun 28 22:47:35 2011 +1000 > > makepkg: fix removing symbolic link > (cherry picked from commit e92905a2c8c14c7855e2841f44d3c139aa40844c)
Yep. Makes sense. I'll roll a -2. d
