Le 3 mars 2012 10:49, Pierre Schmitz <pie...@archlinux.de> a écrit : > Am 03.03.2012 04:21, schrieb Allan McRae: >> What convinced me of putting all this in /usr rather than on / is that I >> can have a separate /usr partition that is mounted read only (unless I >> want to do an update). If everything from /usr gets moved to the root >> (a.k.a hurd style) this would require many partitions. (There is >> apparently also benefits in allowing /usr to be shared across multiple >> systems, but I do not care about such a setup and I am really not sure >> this would work at all with Arch.) > > I agree that the /usr subtree we have atm and also the distinction of > bin and sbin is not really useful and confuses more than it helps. > Especially the sbin one doesn't make any sense. So it's nice to cleanup > our filesystem and merge things together. While I don't think a > read-only /usr is of any use or even advisable I see that having > everything in /usr is more flexible; so I am fine with that. > > So in short: +1 from me.
Similar opinion. And as Dan said, please don't patch things, I'd prefer that we cleanup things first, and see what is left. Rémy.
