On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Dave Reisner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 02:39:04PM -0500, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >> Hi, >> >> To introduce the tool for everyone, burp is an aur uploader written by >> falconindy. >> burp @ the aur: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37216 >> >> I currently utilized burp in a script called repotoaur for devtools >> and have yet to submit the script to devtools. >> The patch that introduces it is at https://gist.github.com/2339399 >> Repotoaur's purpose is to make it easy to move packages from the >> supported repos to the aur by introducing 2 commands to devtools >> called community2aur and extra2aur. >> >> In order for repotoaur to get included into devtools, burp will need >> to be in [extra]. >> Since bringing an AUR uploader into the supported repos is a grey >> area, I would like to start a discussion on the appropriateness of >> bringing in burp. >> >> My opinion is that it would be fine since all it is, is an aur package >> uploader and nothing more. >> What do you guys think? > > Since there hasn't really been any strong opposition to this, I'll move > burp into [extra] when I get a chance (probably tomorrow). > > d
I will wait for burp to get into [extra] before submitting my commit. Cheers!
