Am 03.07.2012 18:22, schrieb Dave Reisner: >> Why do we want /lib as a symlink to /usr/lib anyway? You could have the >> directory /lib, only containing the symlinks for ld-linux.so.2 -> >> /usr/lib/ld-linux.so.2 and ld-linux-x86_64.so.2 -> >> /usr/lib/ld-linux-x86_64.so.2 (and, of course >> /lib64/ld-linux-x86_64.so.2 for compatibility). >> >> I don't see any advantage in having the symlink /lib -> /usr/lib, except >> a harder upgrade path where so many things could go wrong. >> > > No offense, but you're a bit late to be trying to shoot this down only > now.
Not trying to shoot anything down, I am just confused why the upgrade path here was not made smoother. This will lead to problems and shitstorms, and you know it. > Perhaps you recall Tom's post (and ensuing discussion) from a few > months ago: I remember the discussion and the plan. I just still don't think it's a good plan. Didn't I say something back then? Maybe not.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
