[2012-10-15 20:48:46 +0200] Thomas Bächler: > Am 15.10.2012 20:12, schrieb Daniel Wallace: > >>> Makes sense. I'll add it to the 'base' group. > >> > >> Not needed as netcfg already depends on it. > >> > > netcfg isn't in base either > > > > As I pointed out recently, it should be.
Possibly, but regardless of what we end up doing with netcfg, iproute2 should be in base in its own right. -- Gaetan
pgp0oXWYm4lbo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
