On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Eric Bélanger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Andreas Radke <[email protected]> wrote: >> Am Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:04:47 -0400 >> schrieb Dave Reisner <[email protected]>: >> >>> An an alternative, we could introduce libotr3 and do a rebuild for the >>> applications which haven't been ported (as to not hold >>> libpurple/pidgin back). >> >> Sounds good to me in this special case. We should do something to >> cleanup staging. >> >> -Andy > > I started working on a libotr3 package. I'll rename/move things around > so it doesn't conflict with libotr. Hopefully, packages will build > against it with minor patching. I'll test that before pushing it to > staging. It should be ready tomorrow. I'll let you know when it'll be > done. > > Eric
Hi, It took longer than I tough but there is now a libotr3 package in staging. The major changes that afffects building against it is: - the headers moved from /usr/include/libotr/ to /usr/include/libotr3/ - the library was renamed from libotr.so to libotr3.so As a test, I tried rebuilding bitlbee against it and I only had to add 2 small sed lines to make it work. We can now finish this todo list.
