On 24.01.2013 17:05, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: > +1 to drop vi. I cannot imagine why someone would want to use this crap ... > > We already have nano in [core], so I think that vim could stay in > [extra] (do we really need 2 text editors in [core] ?).
Related: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20778
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
