On 06/02/13 12:45, Allan McRae wrote: > On 06/02/13 12:41, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >> My opinion on the vi symlink is that we should just patch the packages >> which hardcode vi instead of adding the symlink. If it turns out to be >> too messy, and there is a general consensus on adding a symlink, I >> would be more than happy to oblige. > > I am highly against patching for this.
I should point out, this means at least half the packages that would require adjustment will not be changed. Allan
