On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 07:05:42PM +1100, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > [2013-03-09 20:01:22 +0100] Ike Devolder: > > Just a small question, will we provide migration paths for people using > > bind as nameserver in their internal networks ? > > Do you mean as a caching name server? For this, just install unbound, > run the daemon service, and you're good to put 127.0.0.1 in resolv.conf. > > The alternative to bind as an authoritative name server is nsd. The zone > files it uses are the same as bind's, but the daemon configuration is > slightly different. It's really not hard though, but if you can't figure > it out Google will find migration scripts, etc. Of course, anybody is > free to maintain bind in any repo or the AUR - it just won't be me. > > Cheers. > > -- > Gaetan
i was just wondering for user convenience, i don't really care which nameserver i can and must use in my local network. -- Ike
pgpgXLDx04YzB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
