Am 08.04.2013 08:54, schrieb Allan McRae:
> What do we do? Do we need to ignore the fact the this should be in
> CPPFLAGS and move it back to C{,XX}FLAGS?
>
> The other options is for packages that are affected by this to unset the
> CPPFLAGS and add it to CFLAGS in the PKGBUILD, but I have no idea how
> many packages this affects. What portion of KDE and GNOME were built
> with pacman-4.1?In PKGBUILD: CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -O2" - problem solved.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
