On 15 Apr 2013 15:50, "Rashif Ray Rahman" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 15 April 2013 17:52, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > > In fact, I will provide the needed patches for a separate [debug] and > > [community-debug] repo if that is what is decided to happen. > > I personally think that is the only way to go about it. I wouldn't > want -debug packages to take up search output, but I'd want them to > exist somewhere accessible.
Couldn't pacman be fixed to only show debug packages in search results when you ask for it with a switch? Maybe something similar could be done for language packages? > An immediate possibility is to simply duplicate buildscripts to the > debug repos and push only debug packages there. > > Of course, that'd be a manual process, and stuff won't be in > sync/integrated, but it does mean that it's not anything impossible > given our current packaging infrastructure. > > > -- > GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
