On 22/04/13 23:31, Dan McGee wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Pierre Schmitz <[email protected]> wrote: >> Am 22.04.2013 12:31, schrieb Allan McRae: >>> So I would propose: >>> 1) x86_64 signoff policy stays the same >>> 2) i686 only requires one signoff >>> 3) the one i686 signoff can be waived if there is a testsuite that passes >> >> Thanks for bringing this up to make it finally an official policy. This >> might need some changes to archweb though. > > The default "# of signoffs to require" would be easy enough to > configure based on architecture. I'll spike this right now. > > Allan, for point (3), I wonder if some more makepkg meta info would > come in handy here? We now record checkdeps and makedeps, but also > recording > > function = build > function = package > function = check > > or something like that might be useful for this and other tools. A > even more sophisticated approach might record the total time each of > these steps took...food for thought. >
We could... or we could store the build logs that are always generated when using makechrootpkg? I think they are always useful to refer back to. I don't think time spent on these is a useful metric. Allan
