On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Evangelos Foutras <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 04/05/13 10:38, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > > Tentatively, should we just run the fixer for the affected packages > > and push them to testing (so visuals don't break all of a sudden after > > updates)? Whether the maintainer says anything or not, we're gonna > > have to move stuff out from testing anyway. > > I'd like to move the packages out of testing too, so I created a todo > list to fix the problematic packages: > > https://www.archlinux.org/todo/fix-invalid-pngs-for-libpng-16/ > > I left out some packages that shouldn't need to be fixed. (Unused PNGs > that only exist in the source files.) > > It'd also be nice to push the fixed PNGs upstream so we can drop our > manual fixing in future versions. This would only be worthwhile for > actively maintained software (in my opinion). > I'm in the process of fixing kdelibs3. I notice that optipng doesn't fix all png files. Some are still broken after running optipng on them. I still need to figure out how to fix them (maybe I need to use an optipng option). This is just a heads up.
