On 15/05/13 07:17, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:07:59PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Dave Reisner <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:37:43PM +0200, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >>>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 @ 22:22:08 >>>>> Author: bpiotrowski >>>>> Revision: 90846 >>>>> >>>>> upgpkg: fail2ban 0.8.8-3 >>>>> >>>>> - correct path to sendmail due to migration to /usr/bin >>>> I see you moved exim from /usr/sbin/sendmail to /usr/bin/sendmail. >>>> >>>> This path is hardcoded to /usr/sbin/sendmail in _many_ sotfwares and >>>> all others rely on it (ssmtp, postfix, opensmtpd, heilroom-mailx, >>>> etc). >>>> >>>> By example, >>>> # mail -s toto [email protected] >>>> test >>>> . >>>> EOT >>>> /usr/sbin/sendmail: No such file or directory >>>> "/root/dead.letter" 9/210 >>>> . . . message not sent. >>>> >>>> I think we should do this correctly and rebuild /usr/sbin/sendmail in >>>> one shot, or include it in the global switch. >>> >>> It's only hardcoded as /usr/sbin/sendmail for mailx because that's what >>> the PKGBUILD for heirloom-mailx sets it to. Other packages can be fixed >>> as well. >> >> I'm not following. If this path is hardcoded in several packages (and >> presumably in lots of custom packages/scripts), isn't this precisely >> one of the cases where we should delay the move until we do the proper >> usrmove and create the compat symlinks? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Tom > > Expanding on that logic, why aren't we just doing this all at once? >
I really wanted to reduce the size of the job first, given ~90% of the rebuild could be easily done separately. Allan
